Saturday, December 30, 2023

A 2023 Review of Education’s Most (De)Pressing Issues

Productive Practices to Address the Pressure Points in Your District or School

[CLICK HERE to read this Blog on the Project ACHIEVE Webpage]

Dear Colleagues,

Introduction

   At the end of every (calendar) year, I review and analyze the twenty-three Blogs that I have written that year to identify themes, consistencies, inconsistencies, and my recommended solutions to the thorniest problems in education.

   When I started writing these bimonthly Blogs—beginning in 2015 (this being Blog #207)—I’m not sure I would have believed I would still be writing at the cusp of 2024.

   A lot has happened since 2015. . . and certainly, my Blog approach and style has evolved. But, significantly—and to be candid—I continue to have no real plan of action.

   That is, most of my Blogs emerge organically from current events, just-published research or national reports, and my own work and experiences in the field.

   Somehow. . . about a week before my next (self-imposed) Blog “deadline,” things begin to jell. . . and I start writing. I write in airplanes, in hotels after days of consulting, on the weekends, on scribbled notes when a Blog title or idea suddenly emerges.

   In the end. . . my goal is to make connections.

   A connection between what initially appears to be independent events or topics. Certainly, a connection with those of you who read this Blog. But more so, a connection with the students, staff, and schools that are trying to navigate so many national, state, and/or local hurdles and barriers in their quest to produce the next generation of high school graduates who will become our next generation of leaders.

   And so, to both identify some of these hurdles and barriers, and—more  importantly—to help overcome and minimize them. . . this Year in Review.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Review I: Taking Stock of the Nation’s Top Educational Challenges

   In the last Blog, we discussed a “high-hit” list of the reasons underlying students’ current social, emotional, and behavioral challenges in their schools and in lives:

"The Over-Simplification of Education: When Evidence-based Practices are Diluted, They No Longer are Evidence-Based"

[CLICK HERE for December 9, 2023 BLOG]

_ _ _ _ _

   The challenges cited were:

·       Online and in-person teasing, bullying, and harassment

·       Schoolwork and homework pressures, and being “academically behind”

·       Grades and graduation—including college/job selection, costs, and attendance

·       School safety and the threat of (gun-related and other) physical violence and injury

·       Gender identity conflicts (self and others), peer/social status, relationships and dating

·       Sleep, diet/nutrition, physical health, exercise

·       Living in poverty, along with housing and food insecurity

·       (Pandemic-related) grief and loss

·       Local/national/world events, and political divisiveness

·       Cultural, minority background, religious, disability, and/or sexual orientation stresses

·       Climate-related and other natural disasters

_ _ _ _ _

   On a broader level, we recently reviewed the top national newspapers, newsletters, and daily e-Blasts in education, identifying the following thirteen persistent “high-hit” challenges to districts, schools, and educators during 2023.

   These have become (from organizational to student to societal) our:

Baker’s Dozen of Educational Issues Directly Impacting Schools in 2023

·       Funding Cliffs, Shortages, and Equity-Absent Budgeting

·       Staffing Gaps and Out-of-Field Teachers

·       Declining Enrollment and “Lost” Enrollees

·       Chronic and Cumulative Attendance Problems

·       Using “Scientific” Curriculum and Instruction in Literacy and Mathematics

·       School Discipline, Continuing Disproportionality, and the Implementation of Unproven “Solutions”

·       Gaps in Academic Skills, Readiness, and Proficiency

·       Social Media, Cell Phones, and Media Literacy

·       School Climate, and Student Engagement and Mental Health

·       Student Teasing, Bullying, Intolerance, and Social-Emotional Skill Deficits

·       Protecting LGBTQIA+ Students, Pronouns, and Gender-Specific Bathrooms

·       Book Bans, Curriculum Reviews by Parents, and Other Parental Political Pressures

·       Discussions of Race, Religion, and National/World Events

   As each of these topics would certainly require a book-length discussion, we will let you decide how many of these challenges were and are relevant to you, and in what contexts. You can then self-evaluate how you are currently addressing these challenges, and  how successfully.

   For me as a consultant—working on-site with nearly a hundred or more schools during 2023—many of these challenges significantly impacted our work together. . . as well as the analyses we conducted, and the successful solutions we implemented.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Review II: Our Analyses and Solutions for the Nation’s Top Educational Challenges

   A review of our Blogs during 2023 shows a significant overlap between the analyses and solutions we presented for the most compelling challenges in education this year, and the Baker’s Dozen of nationally-recognized challenges above.

   Indeed, when organized into specific themes, we addressed the following five broad topic areas:

·       Theme 1. Hiring, Supervising, Supporting, and Retaining School Staff

·       Theme 2. Encouraging Effective and Eliminating Ineffective Staff Policies and Practices

·       Theme 3. Special Education Services for Students with Disabilities

·       Theme 4. Social-Emotional Learning’s Illusions and Realities

·       Theme 5. Race and Equity: Research and Effective Practices

_ _ _ _ _

   Below, we summarize each theme, and then share the titles, dates, and links to the Blogs in each theme—for those who want to read or re-read their detailed analyses and specific solutions.

   NOTE:

TO LINK TO EACH BLOG, CLICK ON THE PUBLICATION DATES ABOVE EACH TITLE

_ _ _ _ _

   To begin, however, we want to highlight our November 11th Blog which includes four Education Talk Radio interviews we did in 2023 with Host Larry Jacobs.

November 11, 2023

Solving Schools' Most Persistent Problems: Safety and Mental Health Services, Discipline and Disproportionality, Special Education Litigation, and Staffing Shortages. Solutions from Four Recent Education Talk Radio Interviews

   Embedded in this Blog are four separate 35-minute interviews where we discuss the issues below with explicit multi-level and multi-tiered interventions:

·       School Safety and their Connection with Needed Mental Health Services 

·       Classroom Disruptions and the Disproportionate Referrals of Students of Color and with Disabilities to the Principal’s Office for Discipline or Suspension 

·       Preventing and Decreasing Special Education Due Process Hearings and Court Litigation 

·       Improving the Quality of Staff Hiring, Supervision, and Retention

 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

  And now. . . onto our 2023 Blogs and five Blog themes.

Theme 1. Hiring, Supervising, Supporting, and Retaining School Staff

   While lower than predicted, a large number of teachers, administrators, and other educators have left their district or school positions. Some of these positions remain unfilled, while others have been filled by unprepared or out-of-field individuals. Notable vacancies exist in special education, math, and the sciences, while the turn-over of superintendents and building principals remains high.

   Even when school positions are filled, the quality of instruction, administration, and support services varies considerably across the country. This speaks to the importance of professional development, coaching and mentoring, and supervision and evaluation.

   To address all of these issues, we presented a four-Blog Series with many suggestions related to high-quality recruitment and hiring, orientation and induction, coaching and supervision, accountability and tenuring, and professional growth and continuous improvement.

   Our 2023 Blogs in this area were:

April 8, 2023

Improving Hiring and Staffing in a Nation Where Teaching is At Risk: If Student Success Depends on Teachers, Why is the Selection Process so Simplistic? (Part I)

_ _ _ _ _

April 29, 2023

Teacher Induction and “Tenure with Teeth”: Improving Hiring and Staffing in a Nation Where Teaching is At Risk (Part II)

_ _ _ _ _

May 13, 2023

Maintaining Teacher Motivation and Effectiveness After Tenure: Accountability, Growth, Coaching, and Continuous Improvement (Part III)

_ _ _ _ _

May 27, 2023

Ensuring that Post-Tenure Teachers Remain Actively Engaged as Collaborative Contributors in their Schools: Aligning the Seven Areas of Continuous School Improvement to Teacher Leadership and Advancement (Part IV)

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Theme 2. Encouraging Effective and Eliminating Ineffective Staff Policies and Practices

   As one who uses the science of strategic planning—including needs assessments, resource analyses, and systems-level processes—to help districts and schools maximize their resources and student, staff, and school outcomes, I am constantly identifying, field testing, and encouraging specific effective practices.

   The “field-testing” often occurs as I consult with schools across the country in the areas of school improvement and safety, student behavior and disproportionate discipline approaches, differentiated instruction and social skill (SEL) training, and multi-tiered interventions and special education services and supports.

   And critically, my consultation does not involve one-shot “fly-by” stopovers.

   Instead, I work with districts and schools in well-planned, systematic, scaffolded visits that have clearly defined evaluation plans to validate meaningful and shared outcomes.

   This past year, our Blogs highlighted a number of areas focused on improving district- and school-level policies and practices. Some of these Blogs focused on eliminating the “procedural traps and dead-ends” that create harmful patterns and ineffective processes. Other Blogs addressed creative and/or alternative approaches that enhance staff skills and incentives toward change.

   Our 2023 Blogs in this area were:

February 25, 2023

Solutions for Selectively Mute Students and Educators: The Long-Term Adverse Educational Effects When Inappropriate Behavior is Ignored

_ _ _ _ _

March 25, 2023

How the “System” Forces Schools into Decisions that Harm Struggling Students: The “Groundhog Day” Impact of Fear on Staff Mental Health and Job Retention

_ _ _ _ _

June 10, 2023

Using “Flipped Learning” in a School’s Professional Development Initiative: Engaging Teachers and Support Staff in Outcome-Based PD—Even in a Virtual World

_ _ _ _ _

July 22, 2023

When School Policy Undermines Effective Practice: Too Much of Anything Often Results in Nothing (or Worse)

_ _ _ _ _

August 5, 2023

When High School Students Have Significant Academic Gaps: More Concerns and Common Sense Solutions “When State Policy Undermines Effective School Practice” (Letters to the Editor)

_ _ _ _ _

September 23, 2023

Twelve Critical Components for (Continuous) School, Staff, and Student Improvement: Motivation Cannot Compensate for a System with Systemic Deficits

_ _ _ _ _

December 9, 2023

The Over-Simplification of Education: When Evidence-based Practices are Diluted, They No Longer are Evidence-Based

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Theme 3. Special Education Services for Students with Disabilities

   With thirteen different categories of disabilities, there are a wide range of multi-tiered services, supports, and interventions needed by the students identified as needing special education and/or related services. Critically, some students are not identified even though they are eligible; others do not qualify, but still need non-special education services or interventions; and others qualify, but receive incomplete or incorrect services.

   Some of this variability occurs because some districts are trying to avoid spending money or hiring personnel for special education services that are under-funded or that have no available candidates.

   Some of this variability occurs because some districts and schools (a) are more concerned with meeting the sometimes unreasoned unreasonable or annual evaluation criteria used by their state departments of education and, indirectly, the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Special Education Programs; while others (b) still buy-into the false “general education versus special education” dichotomy that sometimes limits the flexible use of staff and strategies.

   And some of this variability occurs because some districts are unfamiliar with the nuances of the federal laws governing services for students with disabilities, and how these laws encourage effective, practical services and supports. At the same time, other districts use the law to needlessly erect barriers that undermine collaboration and creativity, and that impede positive and productive relationships with parents whose children have disabilities.

   Our 2023 Blogs in this area were:

February 11, 2023

Was a First Grade Virginia Teacher Shot Because Her Student was Denied Special Education Services? What School Administrators Face that State Departments of Education Ignore

_ _ _ _ _

March 11, 2023

Judy Heumann, Special Education’s History of Litigation, and the Continuing Fight: Complacency and Defensiveness Still Stand in the Way of Students with Disabilities’ Rights

_ _ _ _ _

September 9, 2023

Seven Suggestions to Help Districts Avoid Special Education Hearings: A Short-Term Win May Be a Long-Term Loss

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Theme 4. Social-Emotional Learning’s Illusions and Realities

   The confusion with social-emotional learning (SEL) in schools nationwide continued this year anchored by the fact that (a) nearly 50 different SEL frameworks have been promoted over the years; (b) most have never been validated; (c) ways to consistently and objectively evaluate SEL outcomes are grossly lacking; and (d) many schools say that they are “doing” SEL when their activities are not geared toward explicitly changing students’ social, emotional, or behavioral skills and interactions.

   This confusion extends to fact that many educators do not review and attend to the research that does not support the use of some “popular” approaches, and they are not guided by the science that will help them successfully attain one of their most-coveted goals—teaching students emotional self-control (or self-regulation).

   Our 2023 Blogs in this area were:

January 28, 2023

Why “Do” SEL If It Doesn’t Improve Student Behavior in the Classroom and Across the School: Focusing on Individual and Group Skills to Enhance Student Engagement and Cooperative Group Outcomes

_ _ _ _ _

August 26, 2023

Research Does Not Support Growth Mindset Strategies in the Classroom: How “Culturally Fluent Ideas” Influence Educators to Waste Time, Money, Resources, and Good Faith

_ _ _ _ _

November 25, 2023

Too Many Schools are Teaching Students to Control their Emotions. . . the Wrong Way! Because They Don’t Understand the Science, They Won’t Succeed in the Practice

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Theme 5. Race and Equity: Research and Effective Practices

   Issues related to race and equity continued through 2023 with few changes to (a) the funding (and other resource and instructional) discrepancies that exist between schools with high percentages of students of color and those with mostly White students; and (b) the disproportionate treatment of students of color relative to negative teacher and peer interactions, school discipline, and law enforcement involvement.

   Even as districts and schools have tried to address—especially—disproportionate discipline, their continued inappropriate use of restorative programs (and others) has not followed the research, and has not resulted (and will not result) in success or sustained success. This is largely because some districts adopt “solutions” without analyzing the root causes of their specific challenges.

   Other districts do not read and critically analyze the “research” studies that appear to validate specific programs—accepting the predisposed conclusions of (what really are promotional) reports written by those who are financially benefitting from the sale of the program.

   Critically, this has occurred innumerable times over the years with Restorative Justice Programs—for example, in the Pittsburgh and Chicago City School Districts.

   It has also occurred as some Restorative Justice Programs use restorative practices— that have been independently validated decades ago— to make it appear that their “new and improved bundled program” has legitimacy.

   But beyond these chronic issues, our attention toward the end of the year necessarily expanded to race, religion, and antisemitism with the horrific attacks and brutal killings in Israel by the Hamas terrorists. Here, we emphasized the moral imperative of calling out injustice and prejudice no matter who it involves or where it occurs.

   Our 2023 Blogs in this area were:

January 14, 2023

Ebony and Ivory: Education’s “Racial Divide” Cannot be Crossed Until We Can “Talk Like Friends”

_ _ _ _ _

June 24, 2023

New Paths to Address Disproportionate Discipline with Black Students: New Directives, Research, Solutions, and Another Example of Racial Hate

_ _ _ _ _

July 8, 2023

Is the Restorative Discipline Bandwagon Rolling Back? Five Reasons Why Its Roll-Out Wasn’t Warranted in the First Place

_ _ _ _ _

October 7, 2023

What Boston’s Battle for Integration, Anne Frank, and the Little Rock Nine Can Teach a Divided Country: A Personal Reflection on Why Black Lives, History, and Education Matter

_ _ _ _ _

October 21, 2023

Bringing Justness to Terrorism, Murder, History, and Heartbreak: It’s Not Alright (Part II—A Eulogy of Resolve)

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Summary

   While it may be easy to be “depressed” regarding these significant and (sometimes) chronic educational issues, I believe that there are solutions if we dedicate ourselves to effective strategic planning, objective and data-driven decision-making, and the courage to recognize that there are rarely “quick fixes” and we need to “go slow to go fast.”

   This means that we need to be our own consumers of the research and practice, and that we need:

·       To be wary of the popular education press—who, remember, get paid for their readership and advertising; 

·       To objectively analyze the methods and outcome data—even from “trusted” publishers and/or “big-name” researchers (including me); and,

·       To recognize that, even if a highly market product works (and you need to independently validate this), you must determine that it will work in your setting, with your staff, and for your students.

_ _ _ _ _

   Meanwhile. . . . as 2023 turns to 2024, and our students and colleagues return from their Holiday Break, I hope that you were able to pause and reflect, relax and rejuvenate, and share some fun and new experiences during your Break.

   The “second half” of the school year gives us all an opportunity to rededicate ourselves to excellence and effectiveness. . . to improvement and success.

   If you experienced success during the first part of the school year, I hope that you can go “to the next level of excellence.”

   If you were not happy with your success, what two or three things can you do to regain the traction to address your needs?

   June will be here in six months. . . whether you want it to or not. If you have a choice to act now or in June. . .which will you choose?

Happy New Year,

Howie

[CLICK HERE to read this Blog on the Project ACHIEVE Webpage]

Saturday, December 9, 2023

The Over-Simplification of Education: When Evidence-based Practices are Diluted, They No Longer are Evidence-Based

[CLICK HERE to read this Blog on the Project ACHIEVE Webpage]

Dear Colleagues,

Introduction

   Earlier this week, I was reading an Education Week interview with Sharon Hoover, a professor of child and adolescent psychiatry at the University of Maryland School of Medicine. Discussing the reasons for so many students’ current mental health challenges, Hoover emphasized that the fixation on social media as the primary root cause is counterproductive.

   Indeed, any educator doing an effective root cause analysis knows that (a) there are many reasons why some students present with the same social-emotional “problem,” and that (b) multi-tiered services, supports, and interventions need to be linked to person-specific analyses completed on individual students.

   Given this, Hoover identified (with some expansion by me) a “high-hit” list of possible reasons for students’ current social, emotional, and behavioral issues in their schools:

·       Online and in-person teasing, bullying, and harassment

·       Schoolwork and homework pressures, and being “academically behind”

·       Grades and graduation—including college/job selection, costs, and attendance

·       School safety and the threat of (gun-related and other) physical violence and injury

·       Gender identity conflicts (self and others), peer/social status, relationships and dating

·       Sleep, diet/nutrition, physical health, exercise

·       Living in poverty, along with housing and food insecurity

·       (Pandemic-related) grief and loss

·       Local/national/world events, and political divisiveness

·       Cultural, minority background, religious, disability, and/or sexual orientation stresses

·       Climate-related and other natural disasters

   Clearly, once confirmed, each of these underlying reasons may require significantly different services, supports, or interventions. Thus, the importance of completing the root cause analysis before prescribing interventions is not just essential. . . it is the ethically- and functionally-necessary thing to do.

   Indeed, the wrong student intervention both delays the correct intervention, and it potentially exacerbates the original problem, making it more resistant to change.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

The Pressure to Over-Simplify Educational Procedures

   While students’ mental health concerns are a major concern in today’s schools, and—per Hoover’s point above that we cannot explain this concern by “fixating” only on social media as the primary cause. . .

   . . . my essential focus in this Blog is the over-simplification of education, and the fact that—when we over-simplify—we end up implementing inconsistent, incomplete, inadequate, or invalid procedures, practices, and interventions.

   Once again, relative to students, this serves to delay the correct approaches; it may change, add to, or exacerbate the original problem; and it may make students (and/or staff) more resistant to the “next” (even when correct) academic or social, emotional, or behavioral approaches needed.

   Said a different way:

   Implementing intervention is not a benign act, it is a strategic act.

   The goal is not to “implement interventions.” The goal is to implement the right interventions—the first time—that facilitate positive and sustained changes in the area(s) of student concern.

_ _ _ _ _

Back Story I: Designing Effective Multi-Tiered Services

   When consulting across the country, I am often asked to help districts and schools redesign or upgrade their multi-tiered systems of supports—the continuum of academic or social, emotional, and behavioral instruction, services, supports, and interventions that facilitate learning and mastery for all students across (typically) three-tiers of approaches that increase in specificity and intensity.

   Parenthetically, every district in the United States—per the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)—is required by law to have a defensible and student-centered multi-tiered process.

   But ESEA’s definition of a “multi-tiered system of supports” is broad, letting each district decide how to address its own students relative to their academic and behavioral needs. Moreover—reinforcing this “local needs and response” orientation—the law’s benchmark term appears in lower-case with no capitalization or “MTSS” acronym.

   Thus, the primary federal education law that guides school instruction (ESEA) does not require the MTSS (capitalized) framework recommended either by the U.S. Department of Education (or its Office of Special Education Programs), or any State Department of Education—unless, the latter has legally codified a specific MTSS process.

   Given this—after a needs and status assessment, a resource and assets analysis, and a success and gap evaluation—my multi-tiered consultations at the district or school levels often focus on developing a user-friendly multi-tiered procedural Flowchart to guide the “journey” along the instruction to intervention continuum.

   This Flowchart begins in a school’s general education classrooms with (a) effective, differentiated (academic and social-emotional learning) instruction and classroom management, (b) progress monitoring and mastery assessments for all students, and (c) classroom-based modifications and strategies for students who are struggling to succeed.

   The Flowchart then proceeds through a data-driven, problem-solving decision-tree process to identify the root causes of the academic or behavioral challenges that still exist for some students. . . followed by strategic (Tier 2) or intensive (Tier 3) consultation, services, supports, or interventions as needed.

   Significantly, the eligibility and service processes required by Section 504 (of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973) and special education (through the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act—IDEA), respectively, are also woven into the Flowchart.

   The result of entire consultation process is both (a) a multi-tiered system of supports Flowchart uniquely tailored to the district or school(s) I am working with; and (b) a Guidebook that fully describes the Flowchart, and provides staff with the necessary forms and resources.

_ _ _ _ _

   If your District or School is interested in our sample Multi-Tiered System of Supports Guidebook, complete with our recommended Flowchart and implementation forms, go to:

[CLICK HERE]

   If your District or School is interested in our nine-session on-line/on-demand Course (which includes the Guidebook above)—

Implementing Effective Multi-Tiered Systems of Supports: Academic and Social-Emotional Prevention, Assessment, and Intervention, go to:

[CLICK HERE]

for the Course Syllabus, a free research-to-practice Report, and a free 35-minute Introductory Video.

_ _ _ _ _

Back Story II: Undermining the Design of Effective Multi-Tiered Services

   Periodically, after the initial consultations that result in a district or school’s personalized Multi-Tiered Flowchart and Guidebook, Administrators get fearful.

   The origin of the Fear is often their concern (a) that the Flowchart and/or Guidebook appears too “lengthy, complex, or time-consuming,” and (b) that large numbers of staff members (or a small number of critical staff members) will not “buy-into” and, hence, actively or passively resist or reject the process.

   The result of the Fear is then a request to simplify, cut-down, or “streamline” the process into a “shell” of what it was.

   [Indeed, I have recently been asked to compress a district’s entire multi-tiered services Flowchart into a “One-Pager.”]

   The result of the Cut-Down, as alluded to earlier, is a diluted synopsis that often becomes the “living” public or operational document to the point that no one remembers, attends to, or uses the complete Flowchart.

   Once this occurs, experience has shown, the school’s multi-tiered process deteriorates into an inconsistent, incomplete, inadequate, or invalid set of procedures resulting in ineffective student services, supports, and interventions. . .

   . . . when these approaches are desperately required by the most-needy students in the school.

   Said a Different Way: Rather than focus on effective implementation science, staff communication and collaboration, administrative leadership and supervised accountability, and student commitment and advocacy. . .

   . . . some Education Leaders, instead, “cater to the maddening crowd” by over-simplifying crucial educational procedures that then undermine and negate their efficacy.

   Hence, this Blog’s title.

   When we over-simplify education, we invalidate evidence-based practices.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Never Would I” Analogies

   The request to simplify a district’s multi-tiered system of supports—figuratively—into a one-page flowchart is like:

·       Asking a Medical Professor to simplify a complex operation into a single page of crib-notes

·       Asking the Conductor of the Los Angeles Philharmonic Orchestra to reduce a four-movement symphony into a single sheet of music

·       Asking a Computer Programmer to shorten the code, sending a rocket into space, to a few lines

·       Asking a Car Mechanic to streamline the directions for repairing a transmission to a single flashcard

    Clearly, no one would make these requests. . . or make these requests and expect a “job well done.”

   But, let’s get “closer to home.”

_ _ _ _ _

   From a district or school perspective, no one would:

·       Ask a Superintendent to simplify the strategic planning process needed to establish the District’s next Five-Year Strategic Plan

·       Ask the Chief Financial Officer to reduce the District’s Chart of Accounts and multi-million dollar budget projections for the next year to a single page print-out

·       Ask a district’s K-12 Math Curriculum Selection Committee to evaluate its top-three curricula by choosing the one that looks easiest to implement

·       Ask a Building Principal to condense Danielson’s Teacher Evaluation System to five items when evaluating teachers for tenure

·       Ask a School Psychologist to shorten a comprehensive special education assessment report to a one-page abstract

·       Ask a Teacher to streamline the instruction of Shakespeare’s “Romeo and Juliet” to twenty minutes

·       Ask an out-of-district Consultant to summarize the professional development and coaching on the science of reading to one hour

_ _ _ _ _

   I think the point has been made.

   Whether it is an in-house district or school process, or an out-sourced consultation or professional development, detail and integrity matter.

   Educational leaders who expect their staff to embrace the comprehensiveness of their selected initiatives, need to similarly embrace the comprehensiveness of their colleagues’ contributions. . . especially when that comprehensiveness is required to attain desired student outcomes.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Summary

   Education Week recently published an article about the ten educational “buzzwords” that many educators hate and would like “retired.”

   One of the words is “fidelity.”

   While it would be important to understand the thoughts, emotions, or reactions triggered by this word, this is a tragic reflection on the state of education in our country.

   If we, as educators, are not dedicated to making objective, data-informed decisions—at the district, school, staff, and student levels, and implementing instruction and multi-tiered services, supports, and interventions with fidelity, then are we really fully dedicated to our students, their best interests, and their best educational outcomes?

   This Blog, then, is about doing even hard and complex things the right way.

   In summary: While students’ mental health concerns are a major concern in today’s schools, this Blog’s essential focus is the over-simplification of education, and the fact that—when we over-simplify—we end up implementing inconsistent, incomplete, inadequate, or invalid, procedures, practices, and interventions.

   Once again, relative to students, this serves to delay the correct approaches. It may change, add to, or exacerbate the original problem. And, it may make students (and/or staff) more resistant to the academic or social, emotional, or behavioral changes needed.

   While most educators work each day “with full plates,” we cannot substitute quality for expediency.

   If we do, we will never solve the (student) challenges that are one of the reasons why our plates are so full.

_ _ _ _ _

   As always, I appreciate everyone who reads this bi-monthly Blog and thinks about the issues or recommendations that we share.

   While there is one more Blog yet to come this year, I wish all of you a “Happy Holiday” season on both a personal and professional level.

   When we return in January, we have five to six more months to positively impact our students, staff and colleagues, schools, and other educational settings.

   If I can help you map out your next few months—for example, in the areas of (a) school improvement, (b) social-emotional learning/positive behavioral discipline and classroom management systems, and (c) multi-tiered (special education) services and supports—feel free to contact me to begin this process now.

Best,

Howie

[CLICK HERE to read this Blog on the Project ACHIEVE Webpage]


Saturday, November 25, 2023

Too Many Schools are Teaching Students to Control their Emotions. . . the Wrong Way!

Because They Don’t Understand the Science, They Won’t Succeed in the Practice

[CLICK HERE to read this Blog on the Project ACHIEVE Webpage]


Dear Colleagues,

Introduction

   A few weeks ago, I finished a free three-part webinar series for a company that provides special education data management services to districts around the country. The number of attendees was overwhelming!

   To attract the largest audience, I naturally focused on the most-requested needs of both general and special educators nationwide.

   And so, sequentially, I discussed:

·       Teaching Students Emotional Self-Control and Self-Regulation through Social Skills; 

·       The Seven High-Hit Reasons for Students’ Challenging Behavior; and 

·       Helping Teachers Change Difficult Students: Behavioral Interventions for Disobedient, Disruptive, Defiant, and Disturbed Students

   The first topic, addressed in today’s Blog, is overshadowed by a cascade of unfortunate realities in our schools today. . . that:

·       Most school leaders don’t fully understand the science-to-practice of “Social-Emotional Learning” (SEL). . . its history and flaws, its “smoke and mirrors,” its real outcomes and how to measure them, and. . . 

that most of what they are “doing” is not “SEL,” and will not effectively change most students’ social, emotional, and interactive behavior.

_ _ _ _ _

[CLICK HERE TO READ MORE IN A PREVIOUS BLOG:

January 28, 2023: Why “Do” SEL If It Doesn’t Improve Student Behavior in the Classroom and Across the School?]

_ _ _ _ _

·       Most school staff are teaching students emotional “self-control” or “self-regulation” in ways that so ignore the neurobehavioral and psychological research-to-practice that they will not succeed (and are wasting precious time and resources).

_ _ _ _ _

·       Most teachers are frustrated because their students’ emotional needs (especially after the pandemic) are so significant that they are negatively impacting their engagement, interactions, learning, and academic progress in the classroom. . . and their current SEL “solutions” are not working.

_ _ _ _ _

   This Blog provides the science-to-practice blueprint that all educators need for success in this area, along with a short video demonstrating some of the components we discuss below. 

   The video is from one of the sixteen professional development video-modules/”classes” in our on-line/on-demand course, “Teaching Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Skills to Improve Student Engagement, Self-Control, and Achievement.”

[CLICK HERE for Social Skills Course Information and Syllabus]

   And, as always, I will gladly provide a free, one-hour Zoom consultation for districts, schools, or other educational groups that want a “Q & A” session to discuss this Blog (or the on-line Course) and how to use them in the most effective ways with your staff and students.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Students’ Emotional Awareness, Control, Communication, and Coping

   There are too many “experts,” “non-profit” organizations, and vendors practicing in the social-emotional learning (SEL) arena who are leading districts and schools down dead-end streets.

   They talk in vague, global, and constructivist terms like “emotional self-regulation”. . . they provide implementation “frameworks” that (sometimes) work momentarily in some schools, but not—long-term— in virtually all schools. . . and they advocate (or, at least, allow) schools to choose unproven “off-their-menu” strategies (like mindfulness and meditation) that have no hope for sustained student success.

   It’s time to get real!

   Districts and schools need to teach students the emotional awareness, control, communication, and coping skills that lead to demonstrable and sustained emotional, attributional (think: positive attitudes, expectations, beliefs, and self-statements), and behavioral self-management.

   Said a different way: For their “SEL investment,” schools need to attain observable, explicitly defined, and validly measured student self-control outcomes that are anchored by established, science-to-practice emotional, attributional, and behavioral strategies and interactions.

   This involves teaching all students—in developmentally sound, age-dependent ways—the emotional awareness, control, communication, and coping skills that they need.

   Emotional Awareness involves:

·       Students’ identification, knowledge, understanding, and discrimination of the many different emotions that they may experience in their lives;

·       Their awareness of the emotional triggers that exist in the settings that they go to or must attend; 

·       Their awareness of their physiological cues and responses to different emotional situations; and

·       Their awareness of how others look and act when they are in different emotional situations or states.

    _ _ _ _ _

   Emotional Control and Communication occurs:

·       When students are able to maintain the physiological control of their bodies when under conditions of emotionality, so that 

·       They are able to think clearly and rationally—demonstrating effective social problem-solving skills, so that 

·       They can demonstrate appropriate social interactions and behavioral self-management skills.

    _ _ _ _ _

   Emotional Coping:

·       Goes beyond emotional control to the point where a student is able to consciously process a personal or interpersonal situation in order to master, minimize, or tolerate the stress and conflict. Coping includes accepting someone else’s emotional support. 

·       Emotional coping occurs when students debrief and reconcile a just-concluded emotional situation and/or learn to minimize the emotional impact of a persistent or traumatic situation.  

·       Ultimately, emotional coping skills help students to (continue to) live their lives in emotionally positive and healthy ways—even in the face of continuing, similar, or new traumatic situations (or those that trigger emotional memories).

_ _ _ _ _

   These skill areas combine as students demonstrate, for example, the following strategies or situational responses to emotional situations:

·       Avoiding Trouble/Conflict Situations

·       Dealing with Peer Pressure

·       Being Honest/Acknowledging your Mistakes

·       Apologizing/Excusing Yourself

·       Dealing with Losing or Not Attaining Desired Goals

·       Showing Understanding of Another’s Feelings/Empathy

·       Dealing with Another Person’s Anger or Emotionality

·       Walking Away from a Fight/Conflict

_ _ _ _ _

   From a science-to-practice perspective, then:

·       Emotional Awareness develops through instruction, personal and social understanding, learning and coaching, application and feedback, and evaluation, mastery, and maturation. 

·       Emotional Control and Communication occurs when there is physiological control, emotional self-control, attributional/attitudinal control, and behavioral control and execution relative to understanding and verbalizing one’s emotions.

·       Emotional Coping develops through students’ emotional awareness, and the use of emotional and attributional control skills that are integrated into coping strategies. Hundreds of social, emotional, and behavioral coping strategies have been identified in both research and practice. 

These strategies help students reconcile past emotional situations, live in emotionally positive ways even as these situations continue, and to accept and use the support of others.

   Clearly, this does not occur through even a series of presentations, discussions, pep rallies, or incentive programs.

   It occurs—as with reading, math, and science—through scaffolded preschool through high school curricula and instruction. . . teaching the expected skills through a social skills process that embeds the science-to-practice of emotional self-control and management.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

The Science of Emotional Self-Control

   Most emotion-based behavior is classically conditioned (think Pavlov and how he rang a bell to get his dogs to salivate). That is, a student’s emotional triggers create a neuro-physiological response that results in almost instantaneous behavior.

   The initial sensory information (a) is received by the mid-brain’s thalamus, which (b) is directly transmitted to the emotional center of the brain—the amygdala, which (c) activates the nearby hippocampus of past memories and experiences, which (d) produces a “fight, flight, or freeze” response.

   Some of the emotional trigger’s sensory information is also transmitted to the cortex or “thinking” part of the brain. Here, the information is more deliberately processed and analyzed, whereby the student makes a “good or bad choice” based on past or present incentives or consequences, and/or planned goals or outcomes.

   Critically, the amygdala receives and processes emotional information milliseconds before the cortex and, in the face of high-emotion triggers or situations, it neuro-physiologically activates the HPA (hypothalmic-pituitary-adrenal) axis. This biochemically (a) pre-empts the potential for more rationale thinking in the cortex, and (b) fast-tracks the conditioned fight, flight, or freeze response to occur.

   Students’ emotional self-control, then, is dependent on them being trained in and mastering the elements witin the “Emotional Control Paradigm.”

   This involves: 

·       An awareness of their (the students’) individual “emotional triggers” and  “physiological cues”...

·       So they can (a) consciously prevent or avoid significant emotional situations, while (b) instantaneously producing a classically-conditioned relaxation, thought-stopping, or physiological de-escalation response—especially for the situations that are unavoidable or unexpected. . .

·       Allowing them to (attributionally) think clearly, positively, and proactively regarding their choices, goals, or desired outcomes. . .

·       So they make good choices, demonstrate appropriate behavior or interactions, and productively cope with the situation now and in the future.

_ _ _ _ _

   At this point (Action Step Alert!), districts and schools need to determine if the instruction, strategies, and/or interventions they are currently using to teach emotional self-control to their students (at the Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 levels) are well-matched to the science above.

   Based on my consultation work across the country and internationally, my guess is that most schools have invested virtually all of their efforts in “thinking-based” (cortex-related) approaches, rather than the “conditioned-based” (amygdala-related) interventions needed to change students’ more prevalent fight, flight, or freeze emotional responses.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

A Deeper Dive into Triggers, Cues, and Conditioned De-Escalation

   As long as we’re here, let’s explore the essential components within the “Emotional Control Paradigm” described above.

Teaching Students to Identify and Understand Different Emotions

   At the preschool through Grade 2 levels, students need to learn about different emotions, what they look and sound like, and what others’ are feeling when they express them. Examples of common emotions at these grade levels include: Happy, Afraid, Guilty, Excited, Sorry, Jealous, Sad, Proud, Tired, Angry, Bored, Loved, Embarrassed, Irritated, Frustrated, Surprised, Hopeful, and Shy.

   At the Grade 3 to 5 levels, this instruction moves to more complex emotions, while also teaching students how different internal thoughts are associated with different emotional states. Here, students can be introduced to the ways that their attitudes, expectations, beliefs, self-statements, and attributions can influence their emotions and behavior. They also should be taught how to recognize and interpret non-verbal peer and adult signals and exchanges—and, especially, how to discriminate among and accurately interpret different voice intonations.

   At the Grade 6 and above levels, everything is elevated to a higher level of skill, complexity, and automaticity. At the same time, these students are taught how to anticipate and prepare for different emotional situations, to respond to and minimize the impact of adverse conditions, and to demonstrate empathy for others’ adversity and misfortune. Finally, these students must learn how to evaluate not just verbal and physical cues, but social, cultural, and environmental cues such that they can predict and respond to others’ emotions.

   Across all of these levels, students need to learn and begin to master the interpersonal, social problem-solving, and conflict prevention and resolution skills that they need through a systematic social skills process.

   Part of this instruction teaches students to demonstrate their social skills “under conditions of emotionality.” Hence, students learn and practice emotional self-control even with the “basic” social skills of Listening, Following Directions, Asking for Help, and Ignoring Distractions (etc.).

   See Our Previous Blog:

January 28, 2023: Why “Do” SEL If It Doesn’t Improve Student Behavior in the Classroom and Across the School?

[CLICK HERE TO READ THIS BLOG]

_ _ _ _ _

Emotional Triggers, Physiological Cues, and Beliefs or Self-Statements

   In addition to teaching students about different emotions and emotional states, developmentally-sensitive instruction is needed to help them to be aware of and identify their emotional triggers, physiological cues, and related beliefs or self-statements.

   Emotional Triggers are typically external events (although a belief or self-statement could qualify here) that activate students’ memories and/or emotions and, ultimately, impact their behavior. Examples include (a) verbal sounds, words, statements, or intonations; (b) nonverbal looks, gestures, pictures, or movements; (c) smells or other sensory stimuli; or (d) stories, discussions, movie clips, or other interactive experiences.

   Triggers can be positive, comforting, or satisfying, or they can be negative, aversive, or troubling. When negative triggers evoke students’ intense or prolonged emotional reactions, teachers should consult with their school mental health colleagues who may collaborate with parents or guardians to access more intensive or therapeutic services, supports, or interventions.

   Some common negative school-based student triggers include:

·       Not Getting a Teacher’s Attention or Being Reprimanded

·       Not Getting Their Own Way or Being Told What to Do

·       Being Frustrated with Schoolwork or Grading

·       Being Assigned to Undesired Cooperative or Project Groups

·       Having to Discontinue an Activity or Transition When Not Ready

·       Feeling That a Teacher or Peer is Being Unfair

·       Being Teased, Taunted, or Bullied

·       Being Rejected or Left Out

   Developmentally, while they experience and react to them, preschool to Grade 2 students have limited (pre-)awareness of or insight into their emotional triggers. As such, these students’ triggers are largely identified through teachers’ day-to-day observations. Grade 3 to 5 students have more self-awareness and understanding of their emotional triggers over time. And Grade 6 and above students are able to integrate this awareness and insight—still with adult guidance—into increasingly more complex social situations and dilemmas.

_ _ _ _ _

   Physiological Cues are the places in students’ (everyone’s) bodies that activate when they are under (usually negative or aversive) conditions of emotionality. Critically, different students have different physiological cues, and most students are unaware of them until asked by an adult.

   Thus, teachers need to help students identify their physiological cues as a critical part of their “Physiological Awareness.”

   Examples of Physiological Cues include the following:

·       Temples Throbbing or Forehead Pounding

·       Heart Racing or Breathing Quickening

·       Palms Sweating or Neck/Face Flushing

·       Eyes Tearing or Throat Tightening

·       Shoulders Aching or Hands Clenching

·       Stomach Hurting or Head “Spinning”

·       Feeling Unsteady, Unbalanced, or Dizzy

_ _ _ _ _

   Emotion-Based Beliefs or Self-Statements are attitudes, expectations, beliefs, self-statements, or attributions that influence students’ motivation, emotions, and/or behavior.

   Typically, positive and healthy beliefs or self-statements facilitate students’ (a) emotional wellness, stability, and control; (b) feelings of confidence, readiness, conviction, or self-reliance; and (c) potential to demonstrate prosocial behaviors and interactions.

   Conversely, negative, counterproductive, or debilitating beliefs or self-statements can (a) trigger students’ physiological cues; along with (b) feelings of—for example—anger, hurt, frustration, embarrassment. This can result in (c) a continuum of social, emotional, or behavioral responses ranging from aggression and “acting out,” to anxiety and “checking out.”

   Examples of Positive Beliefs or Self-Statements include:

·       I am capable and strong.

·       I believe in and trust myself.

·       I can achieve my goals.

·       I am proud of myself for trying.

·       I can handle any problem I face.

·       I respond to criticism in a constructive way.

·       I am my own best friend and cheerleader.

·       I love and forgive myself for past mistakes.

   _ _ _ _ _

   Examples of Negative Beliefs or Self-Statements include:

·       I’m not worth it. There’s no use.

·       I have no control over my happiness or success.

·       I am not enough.

·       I must do everything perfectly.

·       Things will never be any different.

·       I am no good unless others’ accept and value me.

·       I am so disappointed in myself.

·       I wish I could just disappear.

_ _ _ _ _

Conditioning Students for Emotional De-Escalation

   We teach students emotional de-escalation by classically conditioning the awareness of their negative triggers and physiological cues to our Stop & Think Social Skills Program’s language and process.

   The Stop & Think Social Skills Program was identified by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration (SAMHSA) as an evidence-based program in 2000, and it is listed on the National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices (NREPP).

   The Stop & Think Social Skills Program is grounded in cognitive-behavioral science, it is one of the most popular social skills programs in the country, and it is used extensively at the Tier 1 (prevention), Tier 2 (strategic intervention and special education), and Tier 3 (intensive need and clinical/therapeutic) levels.

   See the free Stop & Think Social Skills Program White Paper on its science to practice at:

[CLICK HERE]

_ _ _ _ _

   When teaching students to maintain self-control when physiologically triggered by significant emotional situations, we condition them to internally use the Core (or Universal) Stop & Think steps as follows:

·       “I need to Stop and Think!. . . Make a Good Choice. . . and Take my Deep Breaths” 

When classically conditioned to their emotional triggers and physiological cues, students counteract the fight, flight, or freeze response within the amygdala by instantaneously “Stopping and Thinking” and de-escalating by taking a series of Deep Breaths.

_ _ _ _ _ 

They then say to themselves:

·       “I know I can ‘Make a Good Choice’ by using these ‘Choices or Steps’ [they internally specify their action steps here]. . .” 

Here, they make a positive self-statement or attribution, and then plan their prosocial response—which typically is taught during the social skills instruction part of the process.

_ _ _ _  

They then say

·       “Now I’m going to ‘Just Do It’”. . . .

Here, they behaviorally put their choices or steps into action. . . so that they, hopefully, can conclude:

·       “Great! Now I can tell myself that I did a Good Job!”

_ _ _ _ _

   An ultimate goal here is to teach students how (a) to maintain immediate and ongoing emotional control during challenging situations by using the first Stop & Think step, so they can (b) think clearly and planfully in the second What are my Choices or Steps step, so they can (c) execute their conflict resolution or prosocial interactions in the third step, resulting (d) in a positive self-reinforcement in the fourth step.

   All of this occurs even as the students are still in or experiencing the emotionally challenging situation.

   Implicit in this goal is the neurobehavioral conditioning that helps students to “Think (Step 2) before they Act (Step 3)”—countering what often occurs when students emotionally lose control and “Act (Step 3) before they Think (Step 2).”

   The needed instruction, then, follows a “Teach-Practice-Feedback-Master-Transfer-Apply-and-Condition” process that is scaffolded over time and, for some students, may involve modified and small group instruction (at Tier 2) or individualized and therapeutic intervention (at Tier 3).

   Even at Tier 1, though, teaching emotional self-control is akin to teaching reading. . . it is continual, progressive, scientifically-based, and outcome-driven.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

A Brief Self-Control Example

   Because of their developmental status, younger students (through Grade 3) typically use Stop & Think scripts that involve Step skills, while older students (Grade 4 and above) can learn and use higher-ordered thinking scripts that employ Choice skills.

   For example, when teaching Grade 1 students how to control their emotions and “Deal with Teasing,” the Step 2 action script is organized in steps because, developmentally, first graders need to follow a concrete, step-to-step sequence to successfully and behaviorally resolve the situation.

   Here, the Script might be:

·       “I need to Stop and Think!. . . Make a Good Choice. . . and Take my Deep Breaths—Counting to Five”

_ _ _ _ _ 

·       “I know I can ‘Make a Good Choice’ by using these Steps: 

1.   Ignore the person who is teasing me.

2.   Ask the person to stop in a nice way.

3.   Walk away.

4.   Find an adult for help.

_ _ _ _ _

·       “Now I’m going to ‘Just Do It’”. . . .

_ _ _ _ _

·       “Great! Now I can tell myself that I did a Good Job!”

_ _ _ _ _

   When teaching Grade 5 “Dealing with Teasing,” Step 2 is organized as a Choice skill because students at this level have the cognitive-developmental ability to evaluate a specific teasing situation—eventually selecting the best choice from a number of possible “Good Choice” options.

   Thus, the Fifth Grade Script here might be:

·       “I need to Stop and Think!. . . Make a Good Choice. . . and Take my Deep Breaths—Counting to Five”

_ _ _ _ _ 

·       “I know I can ‘Make a Good Choice’ by using these Steps: 

1.   Think about my good choices. I can: 

a. Ignore the person who is teasing me, OR

b. Ask the person to stop in a nice way, OR

c. Walk away, OR

d. Find an adult for help. 

2.   I need to: Choose and Act Out my best choice for this situation.

_ _ _ _ _ 

·       “Now I’m going to ‘Just Do It’”. . . .

_ _ _ _ _ 

·       “Great! Now I can tell myself that I did a Good Job!”

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Summary

   This Blog began by noting that most school leaders don’t fully understand the science-to-practice of Social-Emotional Learning (SEL)—explaining why many of their SEL activities are not resulting in the social, emotional, and behavioral student actions, interactions, and reactions they desire.

   Similarly, most schools are teaching students emotional self-control or self-regulation in ways that so ignore the neurobehavioral and psychological research-to-practice that they will not succeed here either.

   Thus, this Blog described the science-to-practice blueprint needed to teach all students emotional self-control. We described:

·       The four interdependent components (Emotional Awareness, Control, Communication, and Coping Skills); 

·       The neuro-physiological and psychological science of self-control—differentiating conditioned versus planned emotional responses; 

·       The components of the Emotional Control Paradigm (identifying and understanding different emotions, recognizing and responding to emotional triggers and physiological cues, maintaining positive attributional thinking, and demonstrating prosocial or conflict resolution behaviors); and

·       How to condition self-control through the Stop & Think Social Skills Program’s evidence-based process.

   Implicit in this process is the goal of neurobehaviorally conditioning students to “Think before they Act”—countering what often occurs neuro-physiologically when they emotionally lose control and “Act before they Think.”

_ _ _ _ _

Teaching 4th Graders Self-Control: A Video Example from our On-Line/On-Demand Course

   As noted in the Introduction, below is a 12-minute Clip from one of the sixteen modules in our on-line/on-demand course,

"Teaching Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Skills to Improve Student Engagement, Self-Control, and Achievement"

   The 2-hour module that includes this Clip focuses exclusively on expanding the specific content in this Blog relative to how to effectively teach students emotional self-control.

   If you are interested in the entire 16-module on-line/on-demand Course, the link below provides (a) a free 46-minute overview of social skills training; (b) the Course Syllabus; and (c) additional Course and ordering information.

[CLICK HERE for FREE 46-minute Social Skills Training Webinar and Course Information]

_ _ _ _ _

   We hope that all of these resources will help you to evaluate what you are doing in your district, school, educational setting, or practice. . . at the Tier 1, Tier 2, and/or Tier 3 levels. . . relative to teaching all students emotional self-control.

   After reading this Blog and (hopefully) watching the on-line Webinar, feel free to contact me for a free, one-hour Zoom consultation if you would like more personal attention on how to apply this information with your staff and students.

   I hope to hear from you soon.

Best,

Howie


[CLICK HERE to read this Blog on the Project ACHIEVE Webpage]