Saturday, November 25, 2023

Too Many Schools are Teaching Students to Control their Emotions. . . the Wrong Way!

Because They Don’t Understand the Science, They Won’t Succeed in the Practice

[CLICK HERE to read this Blog on the Project ACHIEVE Webpage]


Dear Colleagues,

Introduction

   A few weeks ago, I finished a free three-part webinar series for a company that provides special education data management services to districts around the country. The number of attendees was overwhelming!

   To attract the largest audience, I naturally focused on the most-requested needs of both general and special educators nationwide.

   And so, sequentially, I discussed:

·       Teaching Students Emotional Self-Control and Self-Regulation through Social Skills; 

·       The Seven High-Hit Reasons for Students’ Challenging Behavior; and 

·       Helping Teachers Change Difficult Students: Behavioral Interventions for Disobedient, Disruptive, Defiant, and Disturbed Students

   The first topic, addressed in today’s Blog, is overshadowed by a cascade of unfortunate realities in our schools today. . . that:

·       Most school leaders don’t fully understand the science-to-practice of “Social-Emotional Learning” (SEL). . . its history and flaws, its “smoke and mirrors,” its real outcomes and how to measure them, and. . . 

that most of what they are “doing” is not “SEL,” and will not effectively change most students’ social, emotional, and interactive behavior.

_ _ _ _ _

[CLICK HERE TO READ MORE IN A PREVIOUS BLOG:

January 28, 2023: Why “Do” SEL If It Doesn’t Improve Student Behavior in the Classroom and Across the School?]

_ _ _ _ _

·       Most school staff are teaching students emotional “self-control” or “self-regulation” in ways that so ignore the neurobehavioral and psychological research-to-practice that they will not succeed (and are wasting precious time and resources).

_ _ _ _ _

·       Most teachers are frustrated because their students’ emotional needs (especially after the pandemic) are so significant that they are negatively impacting their engagement, interactions, learning, and academic progress in the classroom. . . and their current SEL “solutions” are not working.

_ _ _ _ _

   This Blog provides the science-to-practice blueprint that all educators need for success in this area, along with a short video demonstrating some of the components we discuss below. 

   The video is from one of the sixteen professional development video-modules/”classes” in our on-line/on-demand course, “Teaching Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Skills to Improve Student Engagement, Self-Control, and Achievement.”

[CLICK HERE for Social Skills Course Information and Syllabus]

   And, as always, I will gladly provide a free, one-hour Zoom consultation for districts, schools, or other educational groups that want a “Q & A” session to discuss this Blog (or the on-line Course) and how to use them in the most effective ways with your staff and students.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Students’ Emotional Awareness, Control, Communication, and Coping

   There are too many “experts,” “non-profit” organizations, and vendors practicing in the social-emotional learning (SEL) arena who are leading districts and schools down dead-end streets.

   They talk in vague, global, and constructivist terms like “emotional self-regulation”. . . they provide implementation “frameworks” that (sometimes) work momentarily in some schools, but not—long-term— in virtually all schools. . . and they advocate (or, at least, allow) schools to choose unproven “off-their-menu” strategies (like mindfulness and meditation) that have no hope for sustained student success.

   It’s time to get real!

   Districts and schools need to teach students the emotional awareness, control, communication, and coping skills that lead to demonstrable and sustained emotional, attributional (think: positive attitudes, expectations, beliefs, and self-statements), and behavioral self-management.

   Said a different way: For their “SEL investment,” schools need to attain observable, explicitly defined, and validly measured student self-control outcomes that are anchored by established, science-to-practice emotional, attributional, and behavioral strategies and interactions.

   This involves teaching all students—in developmentally sound, age-dependent ways—the emotional awareness, control, communication, and coping skills that they need.

   Emotional Awareness involves:

·       Students’ identification, knowledge, understanding, and discrimination of the many different emotions that they may experience in their lives;

·       Their awareness of the emotional triggers that exist in the settings that they go to or must attend; 

·       Their awareness of their physiological cues and responses to different emotional situations; and

·       Their awareness of how others look and act when they are in different emotional situations or states.

    _ _ _ _ _

   Emotional Control and Communication occurs:

·       When students are able to maintain the physiological control of their bodies when under conditions of emotionality, so that 

·       They are able to think clearly and rationally—demonstrating effective social problem-solving skills, so that 

·       They can demonstrate appropriate social interactions and behavioral self-management skills.

    _ _ _ _ _

   Emotional Coping:

·       Goes beyond emotional control to the point where a student is able to consciously process a personal or interpersonal situation in order to master, minimize, or tolerate the stress and conflict. Coping includes accepting someone else’s emotional support. 

·       Emotional coping occurs when students debrief and reconcile a just-concluded emotional situation and/or learn to minimize the emotional impact of a persistent or traumatic situation.  

·       Ultimately, emotional coping skills help students to (continue to) live their lives in emotionally positive and healthy ways—even in the face of continuing, similar, or new traumatic situations (or those that trigger emotional memories).

_ _ _ _ _

   These skill areas combine as students demonstrate, for example, the following strategies or situational responses to emotional situations:

·       Avoiding Trouble/Conflict Situations

·       Dealing with Peer Pressure

·       Being Honest/Acknowledging your Mistakes

·       Apologizing/Excusing Yourself

·       Dealing with Losing or Not Attaining Desired Goals

·       Showing Understanding of Another’s Feelings/Empathy

·       Dealing with Another Person’s Anger or Emotionality

·       Walking Away from a Fight/Conflict

_ _ _ _ _

   From a science-to-practice perspective, then:

·       Emotional Awareness develops through instruction, personal and social understanding, learning and coaching, application and feedback, and evaluation, mastery, and maturation. 

·       Emotional Control and Communication occurs when there is physiological control, emotional self-control, attributional/attitudinal control, and behavioral control and execution relative to understanding and verbalizing one’s emotions.

·       Emotional Coping develops through students’ emotional awareness, and the use of emotional and attributional control skills that are integrated into coping strategies. Hundreds of social, emotional, and behavioral coping strategies have been identified in both research and practice. 

These strategies help students reconcile past emotional situations, live in emotionally positive ways even as these situations continue, and to accept and use the support of others.

   Clearly, this does not occur through even a series of presentations, discussions, pep rallies, or incentive programs.

   It occurs—as with reading, math, and science—through scaffolded preschool through high school curricula and instruction. . . teaching the expected skills through a social skills process that embeds the science-to-practice of emotional self-control and management.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

The Science of Emotional Self-Control

   Most emotion-based behavior is classically conditioned (think Pavlov and how he rang a bell to get his dogs to salivate). That is, a student’s emotional triggers create a neuro-physiological response that results in almost instantaneous behavior.

   The initial sensory information (a) is received by the mid-brain’s thalamus, which (b) is directly transmitted to the emotional center of the brain—the amygdala, which (c) activates the nearby hippocampus of past memories and experiences, which (d) produces a “fight, flight, or freeze” response.

   Some of the emotional trigger’s sensory information is also transmitted to the cortex or “thinking” part of the brain. Here, the information is more deliberately processed and analyzed, whereby the student makes a “good or bad choice” based on past or present incentives or consequences, and/or planned goals or outcomes.

   Critically, the amygdala receives and processes emotional information milliseconds before the cortex and, in the face of high-emotion triggers or situations, it neuro-physiologically activates the HPA (hypothalmic-pituitary-adrenal) axis. This biochemically (a) pre-empts the potential for more rationale thinking in the cortex, and (b) fast-tracks the conditioned fight, flight, or freeze response to occur.

   Students’ emotional self-control, then, is dependent on them being trained in and mastering the elements witin the “Emotional Control Paradigm.”

   This involves: 

·       An awareness of their (the students’) individual “emotional triggers” and  “physiological cues”...

·       So they can (a) consciously prevent or avoid significant emotional situations, while (b) instantaneously producing a classically-conditioned relaxation, thought-stopping, or physiological de-escalation response—especially for the situations that are unavoidable or unexpected. . .

·       Allowing them to (attributionally) think clearly, positively, and proactively regarding their choices, goals, or desired outcomes. . .

·       So they make good choices, demonstrate appropriate behavior or interactions, and productively cope with the situation now and in the future.

_ _ _ _ _

   At this point (Action Step Alert!), districts and schools need to determine if the instruction, strategies, and/or interventions they are currently using to teach emotional self-control to their students (at the Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 levels) are well-matched to the science above.

   Based on my consultation work across the country and internationally, my guess is that most schools have invested virtually all of their efforts in “thinking-based” (cortex-related) approaches, rather than the “conditioned-based” (amygdala-related) interventions needed to change students’ more prevalent fight, flight, or freeze emotional responses.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

A Deeper Dive into Triggers, Cues, and Conditioned De-Escalation

   As long as we’re here, let’s explore the essential components within the “Emotional Control Paradigm” described above.

Teaching Students to Identify and Understand Different Emotions

   At the preschool through Grade 2 levels, students need to learn about different emotions, what they look and sound like, and what others’ are feeling when they express them. Examples of common emotions at these grade levels include: Happy, Afraid, Guilty, Excited, Sorry, Jealous, Sad, Proud, Tired, Angry, Bored, Loved, Embarrassed, Irritated, Frustrated, Surprised, Hopeful, and Shy.

   At the Grade 3 to 5 levels, this instruction moves to more complex emotions, while also teaching students how different internal thoughts are associated with different emotional states. Here, students can be introduced to the ways that their attitudes, expectations, beliefs, self-statements, and attributions can influence their emotions and behavior. They also should be taught how to recognize and interpret non-verbal peer and adult signals and exchanges—and, especially, how to discriminate among and accurately interpret different voice intonations.

   At the Grade 6 and above levels, everything is elevated to a higher level of skill, complexity, and automaticity. At the same time, these students are taught how to anticipate and prepare for different emotional situations, to respond to and minimize the impact of adverse conditions, and to demonstrate empathy for others’ adversity and misfortune. Finally, these students must learn how to evaluate not just verbal and physical cues, but social, cultural, and environmental cues such that they can predict and respond to others’ emotions.

   Across all of these levels, students need to learn and begin to master the interpersonal, social problem-solving, and conflict prevention and resolution skills that they need through a systematic social skills process.

   Part of this instruction teaches students to demonstrate their social skills “under conditions of emotionality.” Hence, students learn and practice emotional self-control even with the “basic” social skills of Listening, Following Directions, Asking for Help, and Ignoring Distractions (etc.).

   See Our Previous Blog:

January 28, 2023: Why “Do” SEL If It Doesn’t Improve Student Behavior in the Classroom and Across the School?

[CLICK HERE TO READ THIS BLOG]

_ _ _ _ _

Emotional Triggers, Physiological Cues, and Beliefs or Self-Statements

   In addition to teaching students about different emotions and emotional states, developmentally-sensitive instruction is needed to help them to be aware of and identify their emotional triggers, physiological cues, and related beliefs or self-statements.

   Emotional Triggers are typically external events (although a belief or self-statement could qualify here) that activate students’ memories and/or emotions and, ultimately, impact their behavior. Examples include (a) verbal sounds, words, statements, or intonations; (b) nonverbal looks, gestures, pictures, or movements; (c) smells or other sensory stimuli; or (d) stories, discussions, movie clips, or other interactive experiences.

   Triggers can be positive, comforting, or satisfying, or they can be negative, aversive, or troubling. When negative triggers evoke students’ intense or prolonged emotional reactions, teachers should consult with their school mental health colleagues who may collaborate with parents or guardians to access more intensive or therapeutic services, supports, or interventions.

   Some common negative school-based student triggers include:

·       Not Getting a Teacher’s Attention or Being Reprimanded

·       Not Getting Their Own Way or Being Told What to Do

·       Being Frustrated with Schoolwork or Grading

·       Being Assigned to Undesired Cooperative or Project Groups

·       Having to Discontinue an Activity or Transition When Not Ready

·       Feeling That a Teacher or Peer is Being Unfair

·       Being Teased, Taunted, or Bullied

·       Being Rejected or Left Out

   Developmentally, while they experience and react to them, preschool to Grade 2 students have limited (pre-)awareness of or insight into their emotional triggers. As such, these students’ triggers are largely identified through teachers’ day-to-day observations. Grade 3 to 5 students have more self-awareness and understanding of their emotional triggers over time. And Grade 6 and above students are able to integrate this awareness and insight—still with adult guidance—into increasingly more complex social situations and dilemmas.

_ _ _ _ _

   Physiological Cues are the places in students’ (everyone’s) bodies that activate when they are under (usually negative or aversive) conditions of emotionality. Critically, different students have different physiological cues, and most students are unaware of them until asked by an adult.

   Thus, teachers need to help students identify their physiological cues as a critical part of their “Physiological Awareness.”

   Examples of Physiological Cues include the following:

·       Temples Throbbing or Forehead Pounding

·       Heart Racing or Breathing Quickening

·       Palms Sweating or Neck/Face Flushing

·       Eyes Tearing or Throat Tightening

·       Shoulders Aching or Hands Clenching

·       Stomach Hurting or Head “Spinning”

·       Feeling Unsteady, Unbalanced, or Dizzy

_ _ _ _ _

   Emotion-Based Beliefs or Self-Statements are attitudes, expectations, beliefs, self-statements, or attributions that influence students’ motivation, emotions, and/or behavior.

   Typically, positive and healthy beliefs or self-statements facilitate students’ (a) emotional wellness, stability, and control; (b) feelings of confidence, readiness, conviction, or self-reliance; and (c) potential to demonstrate prosocial behaviors and interactions.

   Conversely, negative, counterproductive, or debilitating beliefs or self-statements can (a) trigger students’ physiological cues; along with (b) feelings of—for example—anger, hurt, frustration, embarrassment. This can result in (c) a continuum of social, emotional, or behavioral responses ranging from aggression and “acting out,” to anxiety and “checking out.”

   Examples of Positive Beliefs or Self-Statements include:

·       I am capable and strong.

·       I believe in and trust myself.

·       I can achieve my goals.

·       I am proud of myself for trying.

·       I can handle any problem I face.

·       I respond to criticism in a constructive way.

·       I am my own best friend and cheerleader.

·       I love and forgive myself for past mistakes.

   _ _ _ _ _

   Examples of Negative Beliefs or Self-Statements include:

·       I’m not worth it. There’s no use.

·       I have no control over my happiness or success.

·       I am not enough.

·       I must do everything perfectly.

·       Things will never be any different.

·       I am no good unless others’ accept and value me.

·       I am so disappointed in myself.

·       I wish I could just disappear.

_ _ _ _ _

Conditioning Students for Emotional De-Escalation

   We teach students emotional de-escalation by classically conditioning the awareness of their negative triggers and physiological cues to our Stop & Think Social Skills Program’s language and process.

   The Stop & Think Social Skills Program was identified by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration (SAMHSA) as an evidence-based program in 2000, and it is listed on the National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices (NREPP).

   The Stop & Think Social Skills Program is grounded in cognitive-behavioral science, it is one of the most popular social skills programs in the country, and it is used extensively at the Tier 1 (prevention), Tier 2 (strategic intervention and special education), and Tier 3 (intensive need and clinical/therapeutic) levels.

   See the free Stop & Think Social Skills Program White Paper on its science to practice at:

[CLICK HERE]

_ _ _ _ _

   When teaching students to maintain self-control when physiologically triggered by significant emotional situations, we condition them to internally use the Core (or Universal) Stop & Think steps as follows:

·       “I need to Stop and Think!. . . Make a Good Choice. . . and Take my Deep Breaths” 

When classically conditioned to their emotional triggers and physiological cues, students counteract the fight, flight, or freeze response within the amygdala by instantaneously “Stopping and Thinking” and de-escalating by taking a series of Deep Breaths.

_ _ _ _ _ 

They then say to themselves:

·       “I know I can ‘Make a Good Choice’ by using these ‘Choices or Steps’ [they internally specify their action steps here]. . .” 

Here, they make a positive self-statement or attribution, and then plan their prosocial response—which typically is taught during the social skills instruction part of the process.

_ _ _ _  

They then say

·       “Now I’m going to ‘Just Do It’”. . . .

Here, they behaviorally put their choices or steps into action. . . so that they, hopefully, can conclude:

·       “Great! Now I can tell myself that I did a Good Job!”

_ _ _ _ _

   An ultimate goal here is to teach students how (a) to maintain immediate and ongoing emotional control during challenging situations by using the first Stop & Think step, so they can (b) think clearly and planfully in the second What are my Choices or Steps step, so they can (c) execute their conflict resolution or prosocial interactions in the third step, resulting (d) in a positive self-reinforcement in the fourth step.

   All of this occurs even as the students are still in or experiencing the emotionally challenging situation.

   Implicit in this goal is the neurobehavioral conditioning that helps students to “Think (Step 2) before they Act (Step 3)”—countering what often occurs when students emotionally lose control and “Act (Step 3) before they Think (Step 2).”

   The needed instruction, then, follows a “Teach-Practice-Feedback-Master-Transfer-Apply-and-Condition” process that is scaffolded over time and, for some students, may involve modified and small group instruction (at Tier 2) or individualized and therapeutic intervention (at Tier 3).

   Even at Tier 1, though, teaching emotional self-control is akin to teaching reading. . . it is continual, progressive, scientifically-based, and outcome-driven.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

A Brief Self-Control Example

   Because of their developmental status, younger students (through Grade 3) typically use Stop & Think scripts that involve Step skills, while older students (Grade 4 and above) can learn and use higher-ordered thinking scripts that employ Choice skills.

   For example, when teaching Grade 1 students how to control their emotions and “Deal with Teasing,” the Step 2 action script is organized in steps because, developmentally, first graders need to follow a concrete, step-to-step sequence to successfully and behaviorally resolve the situation.

   Here, the Script might be:

·       “I need to Stop and Think!. . . Make a Good Choice. . . and Take my Deep Breaths—Counting to Five”

_ _ _ _ _ 

·       “I know I can ‘Make a Good Choice’ by using these Steps: 

1.   Ignore the person who is teasing me.

2.   Ask the person to stop in a nice way.

3.   Walk away.

4.   Find an adult for help.

_ _ _ _ _

·       “Now I’m going to ‘Just Do It’”. . . .

_ _ _ _ _

·       “Great! Now I can tell myself that I did a Good Job!”

_ _ _ _ _

   When teaching Grade 5 “Dealing with Teasing,” Step 2 is organized as a Choice skill because students at this level have the cognitive-developmental ability to evaluate a specific teasing situation—eventually selecting the best choice from a number of possible “Good Choice” options.

   Thus, the Fifth Grade Script here might be:

·       “I need to Stop and Think!. . . Make a Good Choice. . . and Take my Deep Breaths—Counting to Five”

_ _ _ _ _ 

·       “I know I can ‘Make a Good Choice’ by using these Steps: 

1.   Think about my good choices. I can: 

a. Ignore the person who is teasing me, OR

b. Ask the person to stop in a nice way, OR

c. Walk away, OR

d. Find an adult for help. 

2.   I need to: Choose and Act Out my best choice for this situation.

_ _ _ _ _ 

·       “Now I’m going to ‘Just Do It’”. . . .

_ _ _ _ _ 

·       “Great! Now I can tell myself that I did a Good Job!”

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Summary

   This Blog began by noting that most school leaders don’t fully understand the science-to-practice of Social-Emotional Learning (SEL)—explaining why many of their SEL activities are not resulting in the social, emotional, and behavioral student actions, interactions, and reactions they desire.

   Similarly, most schools are teaching students emotional self-control or self-regulation in ways that so ignore the neurobehavioral and psychological research-to-practice that they will not succeed here either.

   Thus, this Blog described the science-to-practice blueprint needed to teach all students emotional self-control. We described:

·       The four interdependent components (Emotional Awareness, Control, Communication, and Coping Skills); 

·       The neuro-physiological and psychological science of self-control—differentiating conditioned versus planned emotional responses; 

·       The components of the Emotional Control Paradigm (identifying and understanding different emotions, recognizing and responding to emotional triggers and physiological cues, maintaining positive attributional thinking, and demonstrating prosocial or conflict resolution behaviors); and

·       How to condition self-control through the Stop & Think Social Skills Program’s evidence-based process.

   Implicit in this process is the goal of neurobehaviorally conditioning students to “Think before they Act”—countering what often occurs neuro-physiologically when they emotionally lose control and “Act before they Think.”

_ _ _ _ _

Teaching 4th Graders Self-Control: A Video Example from our On-Line/On-Demand Course

   As noted in the Introduction, below is a 12-minute Clip from one of the sixteen modules in our on-line/on-demand course,

"Teaching Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Skills to Improve Student Engagement, Self-Control, and Achievement"

   The 2-hour module that includes this Clip focuses exclusively on expanding the specific content in this Blog relative to how to effectively teach students emotional self-control.

   If you are interested in the entire 16-module on-line/on-demand Course, the link below provides (a) a free 46-minute overview of social skills training; (b) the Course Syllabus; and (c) additional Course and ordering information.

[CLICK HERE for FREE 46-minute Social Skills Training Webinar and Course Information]

_ _ _ _ _

   We hope that all of these resources will help you to evaluate what you are doing in your district, school, educational setting, or practice. . . at the Tier 1, Tier 2, and/or Tier 3 levels. . . relative to teaching all students emotional self-control.

   After reading this Blog and (hopefully) watching the on-line Webinar, feel free to contact me for a free, one-hour Zoom consultation if you would like more personal attention on how to apply this information with your staff and students.

   I hope to hear from you soon.

Best,

Howie


[CLICK HERE to read this Blog on the Project ACHIEVE Webpage]

Saturday, November 11, 2023

Solving Schools’ Most Persistent Problems: Safety and Mental Health Services, Discipline and Disproportionality, Special Education Litigation, and Staffing Shortages

Solutions from Four Recent Education Talk Radio Interviews

[CLICK HERE to read this Blog on the Project ACHIEVE Webpage]

 

Dear Colleagues,

Introduction:

   Today’s (and yesterday’s) schools have persistent problems that need both short- and long-term solutions.

   The most-referenced are:

·       School Safety and their Connection with Needed Mental Health Services 

·       Classroom Disruptions and the Disproportionate Referrals of Students of Color and with Disabilities to the Principal’s Office for Discipline or Suspension 

·       Preventing and Decreasing Special Education Due Process Hearings and Court Litigation 

·       Improving the Quality of Staff Hiring, Supervision, and Retention

   Over the past year, we have addressed each of these issues in one or more Blog articles—providing sound research-to-practice solutions that differ significantly from those often cited in the “popular press” that do not work.

   These issues—and their needed solutions—are so pressing that I often discuss them on the nationally-syndicated Education Talk Radio show with Larry Jacobs.

   Today’s Blog will be more auditory than visual.

   Today I want to share four recent Education Talk Radio interviews (each approximately 35 minutes long) so that you can listen to the breadth of these problematic issues and the depth of the solutions recommended.

   I note the “depth of these solutions,” because these deep and sometimes institutionalized problems need long-term strategic planning, professional development, multi-level and multi-tiered interventions, and dogged determination.

   There are no “easy fixes” here. But progress can occur quickly—if schools are courageous enough to commit to the proven approaches that we discuss.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

TalkRadio Program #1.  School Safety and their Connection with Needed Mental Health Services 

   In a March 1, 2023 Education Talk Radio national interview, Larry Jacobs and I discussed school safety (and, especially, the devastating impact of school shootings), their connections with needed mental health services, and additional proven solutions.

   In this show, we addressed five questions/areas:

·       What is the current state of school safety today—as it relates especially to student behavior and discipline, and school violence and school shootings?

·       Has there been an overlap between some of the school shootings in this country and the involvement of students with disabilities and/or serious mental health issues?

·       Discuss the recent school shooting in Virginia involving the First Grade Teacher and her student— who may have had a disability and certainly needed behavioral services. 

·       Do schools have difficulty “qualifying” students for special education services when they know they have significant mental health and/or social, emotional, and behavioral needs? 

·       How does special education funding, state and community mental health funding, and the (lack of) availability of day and residential treatment programs for students with significant needs overlap?

   Two Blogs (January 28 and February 11, 2023 related directly to this discussion:

Was a First Grade Virginia Teacher Shot Because Her Student was Denied Special Education Services? What School Administrators Face that State Departments of Education Ignore”

[CLICK HERE to LINK to the BLOG]    

_ _ _ _ _

“Why “Do” SEL If It Doesn’t Improve Student Behavior in the Classroom and Across the School? Focusing on Individual and Group Skills to Enhance Student Engagement and Cooperative Group Outcomes”

[CLICK HERE to LINK to the BLOG]

_ _ _ _ _

   We hope you enjoy this 36-minute interview.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

TalkRadio Program #2. Decreasing Disproportionate Referrals of Students of Color and with Disabilities to the Principal’s Office for Discipline or Suspension

   In a September 6, 2023 Education Talk Radio national interview, Larry Jacobs and I discussed the historical (and still present) reality that students of color and students with disabilities are disproportionately referred to the Principal’s office for discipline—many times for offenses that other (often White) students commit in the classroom, but are not disciplined for.

   We discussed how “systems-oriented” solutions (like disallowing these referrals at certain age levels) have decreased the total number of office referrals, but not the disproportionality.

   We then focused on the research-to-practice components and solutions to this decades-long problem, and two recent research studies that validate the root causes of the problem and why our solutions are essential.

   Complementing this interview was our June 24, 2023 Blog:

“New Paths to Address Disproportionate Discipline with Black Students: New Directives, Research, Solutions, and Another Example of Racial Hate”

[CLICK HERE to LINK to the Blog]

_ _ _ _ _

   We hope you enjoy this 37-minute interview.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

TalkRadio Program #3. Preventing and Decreasing Special Education Due Process Hearings and Court Litigation

   In a November 10, 2023 Education Talk Radio national interview, Larry Jacobs and I discussed expectations that special education litigation will skyrocket due to the direct and/or related services not provided to Students with Disabilities during the pandemic.

   This is important because—“win or lose”—special education litigation involves countless staff hours for preparation and participation, and often a significant emotional toll on those involved.

   Given my experience as an Expert Witness in many federal and state special education court cases, we discussed seven suggestions to help districts avoid special education litigation with a focus on (a) understanding where parent are coming from when there are significant disagreements over their child’s special education services, and (b) how to approach them with empathy and sensitivity—even when things get tense or confrontative.

   Complementing this interview was our September 9, 2023 Blog:

“Seven Suggestions to Help Districts Avoid Special Education Hearings: A Short-Term Win May Be a Long-Term Loss”

[CLICK HERE to LINK to the Blog]

_ _ _ _ _

   We hope you enjoy this 38-minute interview.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

TalkRadio Program #4. Improving the Quality of Staff Hiring, Supervision, and Retention

   In a May 8, 2023 Education Talk Radio national interview, Larry Jacobs and I discussed the Four Pillars of Teacher Preparation and Proficiency: (a) Teacher Hiring and Orientation; (b) Teacher Induction and Tenure: (c) Continuing Teacher Appointments and Coaching, and (d) Teacher Leadership and Advancement.

   The Four Pillars help guide Novice teachers through the teacher tenure process and beyond such that they (a) effectively teach all students the academic and social-emotional skills needed for success—using the school’s multi-tiered system of supports as appropriate; and—post-tenure (b) continue to serve their school through leadership and specialization. This is accomplished through the scaffolded professional development and growth process discussed.

   This discussion was related to a four-part Blog Series that we wrote between April 8 to May 27, 2023. The last Blog of this Series was titled:

“Ensuring that Post-Tenure Teachers Remain Actively Engaged as Collaborative Contributors in their Schools: Aligning the Seven Areas of Continuous School Improvement to Teacher Leadership and Advancement (Part IV)”

[CLICK HERE to LINK to the Blog]

_ _ _ _ _

   We hope you enjoy this 34-minute interview about this critical issue in education across the country.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Summary

   One of my primary goals is to help districts, schools, and other education-related colleagues to analyze (a) their goals, needs, and desired outcomes; (b) what is working and not working in their systems; (c) why things are successful and unsuccessful; and (d) how to use sound and proven research-to-practice approaches to enhance their successes and achieve their unfulfilled goals.

   As noted, the four areas in this Blog (and our interviews) are the reasons why I often work with schools and districts across the country.

   I love my work. . . and it is an honor for me to work with so many dedicated educational professionals.

   If I can help you in the areas discussed in this Blog (or others related to (a) school improvement, (b) social-emotional learning/positive behavioral discipline and classroom management systems, and (c) multi-tiered (special education) services and supports—please contact me to see how I can help.

   As always, the first discussion with you and your team are “on the house.”

Best,

Howie

 

[CLICK HERE to read this Blog on the Project ACHIEVE Webpage]